Chris Brown is considered one of the most successful and prominent R&B and hip-hop artists of the 21st century. But everyone knows that his abusive actions in the past with his former girlfriend, Rihanna, have pinned a heavy label on his image that negatively impacted his career and reputation as an artist. Then why do we still celebrate him?

 

Although his immense impact on the music industry and the dance community prevails, Brown is a stark reminder of how we can collectively ignore his well-documented history of domestic violence abuse, legal issues and aggressive social media presence. Chris Brown, who was up for a Grammy award on Sunday, becomes a prime example of the paradox within the limitations of “cancel culture.”

The dispute in 2009 that caused Brown to lose so many music deals, banned from many radio stations, which supposedly affected his overall career and image, turned to the release of his album “Graffiti,” which reached the top 20 of the Billboard charts later that year. It led music critics and fans to believe his album showed significant remorse and a plea for Rihanna’s forgiveness. Three years later, he took home his first Grammy for the 2012 Best R&B Album “F.A.M.E.,” and we all seemed to move on from his violent history.

 

As a reminder, many of your favorite artists have collaborated with Chris Brown. Regardless of his countless apologies to Rihanna and her acceptance of his apology, we don’t know if she genuinely forgave him. Her public forgiveness seemed to become a green light for his fans to rise to Brown’s defense and claim his music to be revolutionary and worth listening to now, completely ignoring the fact that she was not his only victim even after five years of probation, community service and anger management rehab. It raises an uncomfortable topic of whether attitudes towards domestic violence are moral standards in the entertainment industry.

The idea behind “separate the artist from their music” is epitomized by Chris Brown in almost every situation. The discussion revolving around his nomination at the 2024 Grammys (his 22nd career nomination) is nonexistent; audiences raised no backlash. Brown remains high on the charts with over 500 million streams of his top songs and 49.3 million monthly listeners on Spotify.

His Grammy nomination for Best R&B Performance on the song “Summer Too Hot” may not be for the quality or message of his music but more for his recognition as an artist and distinguished popularity within the music community. I would categorize him as a good artist but a horrible celebrity. With all that money he makes and the recognition he receives from The Academy, he could have revamped his image and recovered from this incident—I feel that he continues to sabotage his career.

 

To add, he remains a poor example to his young audience as he continuously glamorizes violence and disrespectful attitudes towards women in his music. His behavior should hold concerns on why we continue to stream his music, like other artists with a tumultuous background of abuse. Even though we are now quick to jump onto the “cancel culture” bandwagon, Chris Brown seems to slide past without much flack. Why is Chris Brown an exception? Maybe people don’t take domestic violence seriously enough to shun abusers out of the limelight altogether. What about Woody Allen, Marilyn Manson, or countless other celebrities whose misdeeds and poor behavior are often overlooked for the sake of their talent and skill? Perhaps we choose to let Brown and others slide because of their level of relevancy. We just choose who we want to “cancel” based on what discourse is happening on the internet.

Whether or not Brown’s nomination for the 2024 Best R&B Performance is deserved, the complex narrative surrounding his figure is relevant to the pattern of male musicians’ aggressive reputations being ignored by mainstream society. It raises the question of whether we can look past artists’ dark histories in the name of their musical achievements. The answer is yes. People like Chris Brown still make a lot of money, have a large fanbase and receive press appearances and Recording Academy recognition.

 

Society must hold artists like Chris Brown accountable for their actions instead of forgetting about their dark pasts. When we don’t value accountability, we enter a constant cycle of ignoring and streaming within our consumer society. It is essential not to pardon a history of abuse with award nominations and record sales, as this cycle just enables and excuses harmful behavior within the ones in the entertainment industry. It shines a light on how the industry prioritizes the commercialization of music over the ethical considerations of violent behavior. The media has a reputation for normalizing abusive behavior along with the use of lyricism language within music that makes light of violence and misogyny. As consumers, we must acknowledge these uncomfortable questions about its continued success.